The 2016 Outlander Sport took a major hit in reviews for its bland, bare interior. Standard roof racks, more-rugged body cladding and fender flares and a cleaner, more geometric front nose all make the Crosstrek appear more attractive and capable than the Outlander Sport at a glance. The 2016 Subaru Crosstrek looks decidedly more car-like, despite having slightly higher ground clearance and nearly equivalent width and height. The results have been polarizing, with many favoring the original design. Speaking of noses, the Outlander Sport's front fascia was redesigned to look more in line with its Outlander big brother. This makes the Outlander Sport standout by virtue of its slightly longer wheelbase and beefier front nose. Looking at the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport, it has nearly six inches less length, a slightly narrower width and marginally more height than the Crosstrek. Rather than appearing boxy and tall, the two vehicles aim for a longer, leaner but still stout look compared to other compact crossover SUVs. Mitsubishi Outlander Sport ExteriorĮxterior design is the category that the Mitsubishi and the Subaru seem to parallel most closely. Afterwards, they can visit Lynnes Subaru in Bloomfield to test drive the 2016 Subaru Crosstrek and see why it has left so many good impressions. Montclair, Clifton and Bloomfield drivers can read on and then decide for themselves. The 2016 Subaru Crosstrek trumps the 2016 Outlander Sport in nearly every category, offering a better value and a better vehicle overall. However, that is where the comparisons end. Most notably, they both clearly resemble station wagon or five door hatchback sedans. If you squint your eyes, the 2016 Subaru Crosstrek and 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport have some superficial exterior similarities. ![]() Get pre-qualified with Capital One (no impact to your credit score)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |